Law Enforcement Hiring: 10 Ideas to Help You Identify Better Candidates

By Greg Barlow, CSP, CET

Editor’s Note: This article is part of a series on law enforcement hiring.
No More “Bad Cops”: 5 Steps to Improving Law Enforcement Hiring Practices
Improving Law Enforcement Hiring Starts from Within
Overcoming the Most Common Excuse for Poor Law Enforcement Hiring

Law enforcement is one of the most heavily regulated industries. Every year the feds require more, the states legislate more, and even many local jurisdictions mandate more requirements officers must meet—resulting in more hours spent training on specific subjects. That likely will not ever change.

Law enforcement hiring - Lexipol

In my last article, I discussed the most common excuse law enforcement agencies give to justify poor hiring practices: lack of resources (time and money). New regulations and the training requirements that come with them feed into this excuse. But they are all the more reason why every police agency should spend more time and more resources on hiring the right officers. Think of it this way: If you spend more time now ensuring you have done everything within your agency’s power to hire the right officers, that burden of time and resources will be reduced significantly over time. More on that later—now, let’s get to what I promised last time: specific strategies you can consider to improve your hiring methods.

Shake Up Your Hiring Practices
Following are just a few concepts to challenge your current approach to hiring. Can you do them all? Probably not. But if you can incorporate a few, adjusting as needed to fit your agency, you can have an immediate impact on hiring.

1. Check with your Human Resources and legal departments to find out what type of information gathering you can do within local and/or state laws. In my state, Colorado HB 1262 makes it easier for agencies to share information, but not every state has the same options. If your state doesn’t have an information-sharing mechanism, you may want to evaluate the framework of CO HB 1262 and work with your local POST Board to create something similar.

2. Ask to see HR’s recruitment process. If your HR department handles recruitment and you have never been involved, get involved. You may find hiring practices that are not the most beneficial to your needs. For example, your HR department, without any malicious intent, may have a vetting process that eliminates some candidates before they get to you. If you are not the person who posts the job descriptions and receives the applications and resumes, verify that you are seeing all applicants. Otherwise, you may miss a candidate who could turn out to be the best officer you have ever had, but because they didn’t fit HR’s generic hiring requirements, you may have lost them to another agency—or law enforcement may have lost them forever.

3. Require a cover letter. This is such a simple and easy concept, but it’s often ignored. If the applicant provides you a generic cover letter that doesn’t fit the actual job specification, or could fit any industry, or they forget to update it with your department’s name or address or the specific position they are applying for, it’s an obvious sign that they will not pay attention to the type of important details required in law enforcement.

4. Scrutinize the resume. Too many people skim resumes under the auspice that they are all essentially the same. This is not true at all. If you look carefully, you will see absolute differences that can reveal signs of behavioral traits and decision-making capabilities. Are there numerous misspellings, missing words, inappropriate statements, etc.? Mind you, I’m not referring to simple grammar mistakes. Some of the most educated among us are terrible at punctuation. But if you find a statement or paragraph that makes you cringe when reading it, that is probably a red flag you need to pay attention to. And had you just skimmed over the resume, you might have missed the details.

5. Require at least three or four previous command staff as references. An applicant who refuses to let you speak to their current or former command staff is not an officer you want.

“But Greg, that’s not fair. What if he/she is still employed and worried about retaliation from the current command staff when their job search becomes known?” My answer to that is simple and two-fold: First, in over 20 years in risk management, I have never met a high-quality supervisor or manager in any industry who did not wish the best for their employees. Are they disappointed because they may lose a good officer? Sure. But if they truly want their staff to succeed, they wish them the best and offer quality information to the hiring department.

Second, how often do you find an applicant who has only one previous or current shift supervisor, sergeant, commander, etc., that they have reported to? Maybe the one they have now is not great, but what about the two previous? What about past employment? How many officers only have one current or previous department they have worked for? Odds are very high that most officers you choose to interview have worked at no less than two or three departments. If the applicant doesn’t want you talking to any of them—well, then that applicant is the problem. Sure, it’s possible that every place an applicant has worked has bad command staff, but let’s be a little more realistic!

6. Use your investigative training. If you don’t like #5 and you want to consider applicants who don’t provide references, use the interview process to gather more intel. Ask why they didn’t provide command references, and if they cast blame on their supervisors, prompt them to give you additional details. Few candidates will be able to successfully make up multiple storylines to back up their “bad commander/hostile workplace” accusations. Investigative 101 techniques will likely allow your interview panel to determine if the applicant is being truthful and really does have a problematic situation or if the applicant him/herself is the problem.

7. Use the National Decertification Index (NDI) offered by the International Association of Directors of Law Enforcement Standards and Training (IADLEST). This is not a guaranteed solution as it won’t show an officer who is still in good standing, but it will eliminate those who aren’t.

8. Check social media. Don’t ask them for permission because you don’t need it (and never ask candidates to provide social media passwords). Agencies have a right to look at everything candidates post publicly and to use that information to make informed hiring decisions. Social media can reveal arrogance, narcissism, anger issues, unprofessionalism, recklessness and a whole lot more. Use it! Many agencies would have prevented legal troubles with a simple social media check. Note: To ensure your hiring process is legal, fair and just, it’s extremely important that no one directly involved in the hiring perform the social media check. If you can afford to hire a third-party service to do this, that’s best. If not, have someone in HR or another part of your agency perform the check. Also, only aggregate results should be given to those involved in the hiring decision—a pass/fail, for example. This prevents any appearance of candidates being eliminated due to protected class or characteristics. For example, if you discover a female candidate is pregnant, how can you be sure that won’t impact your hiring decision? It’s best if you do not know this information at all, but rather receive a pass/fail-type report from a non-involved party.

Odds are very high that most officers you choose to interview have worked at no less than two or three departments. If the applicant doesn’t want you talking to any of them—well, then that applicant is the problem.

9. Get creative on interview days. Ask applicants to park somewhere that requires them to walk past several windows from which you can observe. Temporarily post “applicant parking only” signs to create a controlled environment. Alternatively, follow them back out to their vehicle when the interview is over. Either way, gather as much detail as you can. What kind of stickers, markings and/or decals do they have on their vehicle? Did they take up two spots or occupy a “compact car only” space with a large SUV or truck? How do they behave before and while coming into your building? Do they throw trash on the ground? How do they interact with staff and/or citizens? These may seem like silly things to focus on, but they add up to a behavioral assessment. We all know the definition of integrity: Doing the right thing when no one is looking. Well, if they don’t know you are looking, you will see signs of their true persona.

10. Create a “database” of learning experiences, outcomes, behavioral signs, actions, etc. to guide future hiring. Update it after every interview or series of interviews. As we all know, learning from past mistakes is the key to future success. Train all staff, not just supervisors, on interview techniques, desired candidate behaviors and behavioral warning signs. Doing so will help to create future leaders while at the same time giving them the additional education to succeed as supervisors when/if their time comes.

Finding Resources
Now, if you think even a couple of these ideas might help you, but you still can’t get past the “I have no time” hurdle, then you talk to your agency administrators. I don’t mean just the chief. I mean your agency’s risk manager, city manager, mayor, etc. Many times, once properly educated about the risk of hiring the wrong people—and what can be done to help prevent bad hires—these individuals can help you find temporary and/or permanent resources.

If that effort doesn’t pan out, or if additional resources are another budget cycle away, don’t give up! Look at alternative sources, such as retired officers or volunteer groups. If you are lucky enough to have a college with a criminal justice program, talk to the dean to see if they can help. These sources can make phone calls for you, check social media accounts, organize paperwork, etc.

As stated earlier, these are just some sample ideas. Please use what works for your agency. Revise and improve your strategies on a regular basis and never stop that review-and-continual-improvement process.

Even the best hiring system is not foolproof; a rare “bad apple” can slip through the cracks. However, if you follow these suggestions, if you collaborate with other agencies who have the hiring game down to a science, and if you make it understood within your organization that the time and resources spent on hiring practices are of equal value and importance as every other operational parameter, then your organization will become a place where great officers want to work. High-caliber individuals usually want to work with others like themselves. Over time, you’ll be hiring less because you will retain more. Eventually, you’ll have the best candidates seeking out your organization for open positions—improving the efficiency of your hiring practices even further.

Lexipol’s Law Enforcement Policy Manual and Daily Training Bulletin Service can enhance accountability in your agency and reduce liability associated with ineffective hiring, training and supervision. Contact us today to find out more.

CTA button_LE

GREG BARLOW, CSP, CET has over 18 years of risk management experience in the private and public sector. During his career he has consulted and/or managed loss control programs for city, county and affiliated municipalities in multiple states. Greg earned an ABET-accredited safety engineering degree in Occupational Safety and Health from Murray State University in 1998. He believes that, to ensure efficiency, productivity and overall success, risk management must be incorporated into every facet of organizational operations. Greg currently serves as the Loss Control Manager for the Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA).


    (844) 312-9500

Director Daniel Keen
Northampton (PA) Department of Corrections

“It came down to three main factors for us: safety, time and efficiency. This is a way to protect  the staff, public and inmates in the best interest of all.”

Major Jeff Fox
Vigo County (IN) Sheriff's Office

“Lexipol’s Implementation Services program was key to getting our manuals off the shelf. If it weren’t for that, we wouldn’t be implemented today. Departments should recognize their limitations and realize that they likely don’t have the resources to do it on their own. Implementation Services is key to getting it done.”

Chief Deputy Ray Saylo
Carson City (NV) Sheriff's Office

"It’s a huge priority of this administration to teach policy to our sergeants, and Lexipol’s Daily Training Bulletins help us do that. We are constantly drilling into them that policy will protect them as an individual officer. If they ensure that their people are following policy, even if they’re sued, they will be OK.”

Sgt. Bryan Ward
Cumberland County (PA) Sheriff's Office

"Calling Lexipol an insurance policy doesn’t do it justice, because it doesn’t capture the enormous power that partnering with Lexipol provides.”

Chief Deputy Klint Anderson
Weber County (UT) Sheriff's Office

“We spent a considerable amount of money and effort trying to develop and maintain comprehensive and legally based policies and procedures. Lexipol has relieved us of that burden and provided us with a policy system that we have great confidence in and that we can tailor to suit our particular goals and community standards.”

Sheriff Blaine Breshears
Morgan County (UT) Sheriff's Office

“We had a use of force lawsuit, and as soon as the attorneys discovered that we have Lexipol, they said, ‘We won’t have an issue there.’ Our policies were never in question.”

Lt. Craig Capps
White County (TN) Sheriff's Office

"I would recommend Lexipol to any law enforcement agency, whether three-person or 2,000-person—it makes no difference. The program works.”

Chief John Defore
Hiawatha, KS

“By offering 365 daily training bulletins to my officers, I am saving far more than the cost of the software every year. In fact, I was able to show my commissioners a cost savings by utilizing Lexipol for our policy and policy training needs.”

Captain Jeff Schneider
Yakima (WA) Police Department

“KMS tracks and logs when people acknowledge and accept updates, which is very important, and it lets us track who isn’t getting the updates so we can give them the appropriate attention.”

Chief David Maine
The Village of Hunting Valley (OH) Police Department

“What we had before Lexipol had been around for years. It was like every other policy manual I had seen: It didn’t get the updates it needed. The Lexipol manual is a living, breathing document.”

Chief Deputy Lauren Osborne
Surry County (NC) Sheriff’s Office

“If there’s a change as a result of case law, or a procedure that needs to change, Lexipol does the legwork, sends it to us, we approve it and send it out to our people for acknowledgement—and it’s all documented.”

Sheriff Gerald Antinoro
Storey County (NV) Sheriff’s Office

“Lexipol is one of the best products I have seen in my 30+ years in law enforcement.”

Deputy Chief John McGinty
Simi Valley (CA) Police Department

“You get sued for your policies or you get sued for your actions, or both. You can only do so much about actions. But having Lexipol gives me confidence that if we draw a lawsuit, our policies won’t come under attack.”

Chief Kelly Stillman
Rocky River (OH) Police Department

“I can’t say enough about the positives from a chief’s perspective. I don’t know why everyone isn’t with Lexipol.”

Chief Jeff Wilson
Orofino (ID) Police Department

“The Lexipol Policy Manual is easy to use, it’s convenient and you have peace of mind knowing that you have a thorough manual that is going to stand up to any challenge the agency may face.”

Chief Ralph Maher
Oak Creek (CO) Police Department

“With Lexipol, I know our policy manual is going to be up to date. I can turn my back on it today and tomorrow there will be any needed updates waiting for me. That allows me to focus on some of the other things I have to do as a chief.”

Chief Steven Vaccaro
Mokena (IL) Police Department

“If you compare Lexipol to other policy providers, Lexipol is the only one that has policy that has been vetted by other chiefs, industry experts and lawyers. All you have to do is tailor the policies to your agency’s needs.”

Commander Leslie Burns
Mercer Island (WA) Police Department

“Lexipol provides a huge advantage for agencies pursuing accreditation. The tools take about 60% of the difficulty out of the accreditation process. If you want to be accredited, this is the way to do it.”

Deputy Chief Robin Passwater
Kankakee (IL) Police Department

“If you don’t have Lexipol, even with a full-time person dedicated to policy, there’s almost no way you can keep updated on all the laws and also have the training component. It’s an excellent system.”

Assistant Chief Bill Holmer
Glen Ellyn (IL) Police Department

“It’s a no-brainer for me. Someone is watching for changes to laws for me, and then tweaking the content based on those changes or updates in best practices.”

Lt. Ed Alvarez
Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) (CA) Police Department

“I like the mobile app because it tells me no matter where I am when I have updates to complete or when people take the DTBs. No matter where I am, I have access. The officers can get real-time updates. Everything is at their fingertips, any time.”

Chief Greg Knott
Basalt (CO) Police Department

“Lexipol gives you peace of mind because the policies that you’re implementing have been reviewed by professionals in the field and by attorneys—not just your agency’s legal counsel.”

Chief Corry Blount
Bartonville (TX) Police Department

“I feel comfortable that when we issue a policy, it covers what it needs to cover. It’s the most comprehensive policy content I’ve used in my career.”

Lt. Victor Pecoraro
Auburn (CA) Police Department

“The updates are super easy because you can pop them open, see the redline versions and be able to edit it on the fly. Once I learned I could do that, I was excited.”

Chief Joseph Morris
Arapahoe Community College (CO) Police Department

“Officers are not infallible. We have limited memories like everyone else. Working under stress presents more challenges. There are times we need to access policies in the field so we are comfortable in our decision making. The mobile application has been great for this!”

Captain Jesus Ochoa
Coronado (CA) Police Department

“Knowing that Lexipol is keeping our policies current means that there isn’t something else for us to worry about. We can focus on our jobs. That definitely gives us peace of mind.”

Chief Steven Vaccaro
Mokena (IL) Police Department

“If you compare Lexipol to other policy providers, Lexipol is the only one that has policy that has been vetted by other chiefs, industry experts and lawyers. All you have to do is tailor the policies to your agency’s needs.”

Jim Franklin, Executive Director
Minnesota Sheriffs' Association, MN

"Lexipol is, indeed, ahead of the curve with their unique risk management solutions in law enforcement. The Minnesota Sheriffs' Association has been eagerly anticipating the release of the Lexipol Custody Manual. Lexipol meets the needs of law enforcement and custodial agencies by recognizing the emerging challenges facing our agencies, and providing comprehensive tools and resources to reduce liability and risk in a professional and highly efficient manner. The Minnesota Sheriffs' Association is proud of its continued partnership with Lexipol."

Close [X]
Close [X]
Close [X]
Close [X]