Negligent Entrustment

Share this post:

Negligent Entrustment


Gordon Graham
Category: Law Enforcement

Gordon Graham here with Today’s Tip from Lexipol. Today’s Tip is for all the great folks in law enforcement and corrections, and it deals with the concept of negligent entrustment.  

We must ensure the people who are using the equipment are trained, authorized, and certified to do so. 

I’m not going to “go lawyer” and throw a bunch of legalese at you. I’ll just get to the point. Negligent entrustment can simply be defined as allowing folks to use equipment or information that they haven’t been trained on or aren’t certified to use. In the law enforcement and corrections worlds, this can involve various weapons, control devices, and chemical agents.

We’re not allowed to drive cars or fly planes without training and a license. Why? Because it creates varying degrees of risk for everyone. We should have the same mindset when deploying specialized public safety equipment. We must ensure the people who are using the equipment are trained, authorized, and certified to do so.

It doesn’t matter what role you play within public safety. There are myriad “tools of the trade” you may be called on to use. I’m talking about the electronic restraining device, the pepper-projectile or other less-lethal system, the chemical agent, the specialized firearm, the restraint chair, or the SWAT vehicle. If you haven’t had the proper training and certification for such equipment, you must find someone else who has before deploying it. 

Here’s long and the short of it: Those who use the equipment required for us to effectively do our jobs must be properly entrusted to do so. That means the authorization, training, and, in most cases, certification to do so. Without these controls, all we have is another problem lying in wait.

And that’s Today’s Tip from Lexipol. Until next time, Gordon Graham signing off.

Related Blog Posts

Subscribe to Today's Tip

Related Posts

Back to Top